Typical Ib A1 Hl English Exam Question - 2270 Words

With specific reference to two or three works you have read compare the effects of an identified or unidentified narrative voice. The use of both identified and unidentified narrative voices has been an essential feature in most of the poetry I have studied, as it determines the manner in which the content of the poem is presented. Poets will often use an identified persona to express views which they themselves might disagree with in a negative light, such as in My Last Duchess by Robert Browning. Unidentified personas are often used by poets as well; perhaps to give a more universal application to their poems. Conversely identified personas may understandably be used for the opposite effect of giving the poem a personal and intimate†¦show more content†¦The mother of these sons is also mentioned when the bishop reminisces about â€Å"how fair she was†. He even instructs his sons to paint or engrave a Pan â€Å"[r]eady to twitch [a] Nymph’s last garment off† on his frieze. All the aforementioned characteristics of the bishop’s personality together divulge how materialistic and vain the bishop is, as he does not concern himself much with the spiritual and devotional sides of life during his last dying days but instead tries frenetically to secure his earthly, material riches before ultimately relaxing at the thought that even if he does not attain his decorative tomb, Gandolf will still envy him as his mistress was so fair. The use of the narrative voice of the persona in Self’s the Man by Philip Larkin is quite different from the two previous poems as the persona is not explicitly identified, however there are many features of the poem which suggest that the persona is an imitation of a brash lower middle-class man who is untrained in verse, yet shares many of

Sherlock Holmes and Sigmund Freud Compared - 972 Words

Shabnam Shukrullah Meyers THE SEVEN-PER-CENT SOLUTION In the excerp from the novel The Seven-Per-Cent Solution, Nicholas Meyer’s reveals the true nature of the characters detective Sherlock Holmes and the psychologist Sigmund Freud. Although, both of the characters shared similarities and differences in their professional methods that they used in their career, the two characters were both monumental figures that changed the human history through their brilliance in work. First, there are many similarities between the characters Sherlock Holmes and Sigmund Freud. For example, both Holmes and Freud smoked tobacco preferably both tried cocaine while it was legal during the 19th century. While, Holmes used pipe for a way to get away†¦show more content†¦Holmes uses reasoning when he tells Freud doesnt permit any maid into his private study room evidently because of the dust in Freuds study room. The last method that both used was case-study method that was explanatory an alysis of a person or event. Holmes does uses case study method in order to solve mysteries and find the real criminals, while Freud uses case study by analyzing patterns and finding causes for a person’s behavior. Case study method used by both Holmes and Freud, excelled at bringing a deeper understanding to complex issues through experiences and previous research. In addition to having similar methods, Holmes and Freud also had different strategies in their work. Holmes used a method of using blood patterns in order to know where in the room the blood originated, while Freud used subjects life history in order to know why someone is behaving the way they are. Holmes used magnifying glasses while thoroughly analyzing the events, in contrast Freud used his â€Å"pocket watch† which was used for hypnosis especially for cocaine addicts. In the scene when Freud claims that he can stop the compulsion of Holmes cocaine addiction by practicing hypnotism on him, Holmes angril y responds by asking do you propose to make me bark like a dog and crawl about on all fours? which indicates that Holmes doesnt believe in hypnosis and thinks it is a type of trick used by clowns. The third difference inShow MoreRelated Sherlock Holmes: Explore the reasons behind the enduring popularity.3737 Words   |  15 PagesSherlock Holmes: Explore the reasons behind the enduring popularity. One of the main reasons for the enduring popularity of Sherlock Holmes from the time it was written to the present day was the way that all the stories were told through the eyes of Dr. Watson. This showed how incredible Sherlock Holmes was when his own powers of deduction could see a lot more clues and evidence from the same hat as we the reader could see. Also with Watson being the narrator, we are kept in suspense asRead MoreThis Tournament Goes to Eleven4982 Words   |  20 PagesBertha Pappenheim. Sandor Ferenczi and Otto Rank were among the original followers of, For 10 points, what author of Moses and Monotheism, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, and The Interpretation of Dreams who founded psychoanalysis. ANSWER: Sigmund Schlomo Freud 12. During this time, a pilgrimage of 33 Kannon was established that started and ended at so-called eleven-headed temples. A title meaning tent government was created for administrators. The warrior families loyal to Go-Toba rebelled againstRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesof how a quartz crystal oscillator works in a clock. The passage also provides some additional description of the inside of a clock that uses the oscillator. c. Like passage (b), this one describes the inner workings of a certain kind of clock. Compared to (b), it is harder to tell whether any explanation is present, but probably one is present. To tell whether an explanation is present, the reader must look at what is said, then try to reconstruct the intentions in the mind of the speaker. If

The Beginning of Radicalism in Politics - 1684 Words

It is said that the English Whig politician Charles James Fox first used the term ‘radicalism’ in 1797 when he declared a radical reform of the electoral system. This led people to use the term to show support for the movement of parliamentary reform. Radicalism was initially confined to the middle and upper classes in the 18th century but the lower classes advanced radicalism in the early 1800’s. Radicalism began for many reasons. The Scottish people began to see radical change through the Scottish enlightenment, the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Ideas of a Scottish enlightenment began in the 1670s, but it really started in the 18th century. The Scottish enlightenment is the period in the 18th century when Scotland became of the most important intellectual centres in the western world for their outpouring of intellectual and scientific accomplishments. By the middle of the 18th century, Scotland was fully established and known as a major centre of scientific and philosophical thinking. Three of the key contributors to the Scottish enlightenment were Adam Smith, David Hume and Joseph Black. Voltaire, a French enlightenment writer, wrote â€Å"We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation†. The American Revolution began as a political turmoil which took place between 1775 and 1783. It occurred when the thirteen American colonies broke from the British Empire to form an independent nation called the United States of America. This Revolution was causedShow MoreRelatedWhy did the governments of the interregnum fail to find an acceptable settlement in politics and religion? (45)887 Words   |  4 PagesTherefore, Cromwell was a major source of division and was said to be an ideological schizophrenic (Worden). Furthermore division was made worse by Oliver Cromwell (Worden) which is seen with the fluctuation of Cromwells views between 1649-58, beginning with the dissolution of the Rump Parliament, because he favoured the Nominated Assembly, devised by fifth-monarchist Thomas Harrison, however the Assembly was named the Barebones Parliament. Despite Cromwell initially siding with a Godly rule (Smith)Read MoreThe Revolution Of The 1960 S846 Words   |  4 Pagesantiwar demon strations and occupied various public places to make their revolutionary ideas visible and to be heard. In 1960s, the new radicalism took place. New groups of students became to gather, such as the Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) two years later. Both groups were viewed as the leading edge of a new radicalism. These group believed they had a new route to greater freedom. The students documented and summarized their beliefs and what some calledRead MoreCritique Of Hegel s Philosophy Of Right957 Words   |  4 Pagesin his time is the passive dogmatists that deal with abstractions such as idealism, or religion. He instead wants to offer a solution through the concrete: history and criticism, particularly that of religion, philosophy, and political economy. Beginning with Marx’s Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, is the critique of religion. He states that the basis of religious criticism is that â€Å"man makes religion; religion does not make man† (53). In a religious society man has lostRead MoreThe American Counterculture Movement909 Words   |  4 Pagesknown as the New Left in the 1960s. The New Left was a term used to describe the left wing movements in the 1960s and 1970s. Students for a Democratic Society were the largest and most influential radical student organization of the 1960s. At the beginning, there were just a few dozen members, inspired by the civil rights movement and initially concerned with equality, economic justice, peace, and participatory democracy. With the escalation of the Vietnam War, SDS grew rapidly as young people protestedRead MoreRadicalism of the American Revolution990 Words   |  4 PagesIn the book Radicalism of the American Revolution, written by Gordon S. Wood, the author states, The Revolution was the most radical and far reaching event in American history.† What about the American Revolution made it so â€Å"radical?† Wood believes it to be so radical because it not only brought change politically from British monarch to American rule which is what we are used to, but it also brought about changes in the basic structure of American society. Within the revolution there was more thanRead MoreEssay on Kedo uries Nationalism602 Words   |  3 Pagesnationalism as a doctrine invented in Europe at the beginning of the nineteenth century, emphasizing the artificial character of this ideology that combines the political idea of self-government with anthropological notions of shared national characteristics. To understand the development of nationalism, Kedourie looks back into some events and ideas that form the history and set the background for the creation of the ideology. Kedourie traces the beginning of nationalism to the historical event of theRead MoreRobert Gross The Minutemen And Their World1664 Words   |  7 PagesMinutemen and Their World examines a town s role in the events of the colonial revolution. Specifically that of Concord, Massachusetts in the years before, during and after the Revolution. Gross provides details about the inner workings of town politics, religion, and society for the period. He notes how town’s people’s rivalries and religious fissures occupied the townspeople through the prerevolutionary period. Gross details how Concord was largely absent from the pre-Revolutionary activitiesRead MoreEssay on Hezbollah: Lebanese Shiite Militia956 Words   |  4 Pagesmajority. The Maronites had external support from France who intervened to ensure Maronite dominance until the 1950s, after the Suez War.# Around the same time, the demographic balance was beginning to fall into a Muslim advantage. In 1975, Lebanon brok e out into a civil war due to the mixture of ideological radicalism between the various religious groups present.# The Maronite status began to decline and Sunni and Shiite representation began to expand. Israel intervened in the late 1970s to try and helpRead MoreAn Analysis Of Frost At Midnight, And Political Anxietie1652 Words   |  7 Pagesconcerning for European powers; it demonstrated that radical political ideas could take hold in a country and utterly overturn hegemonic structures that had been firmly in place for centuries. These worries were exacerbated as radical revolutionary politics spread around Europe, including Britain, where it reached Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his contemporaries. Furthermore, Britain had been at war with France since 1793, and many Britons, including Coleridge, worried about the threat of an invasionRead MoreShort Term and Long Term Causes of the Civil War Essay978 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Missouri Compromise in order to expand their â€Å"p eculiar institution.† When this bill became law, it shattered the Democratic Party’s unity, and also caused politics of the time to completely reorganize as many democrats left the party to join the new party that was emerging, known as the Republican Party. The country was already beginning to divide politically, and the physical divide would be soon to follow. By 1856, the Republican party had become the equally influential alternative to the

Philosophy Kants Universal L Essay Example For Students

Philosophy Kants Universal L Essay Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of theCategorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions. This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim andconsiders whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rationalbeings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it tobe a universal law. Once it is clear that the maxim passes both prongsof the test, there are no exceptions. As a paramedic faced with adistraught widow who asks whether her late husband suffered in hisaccidental death, you must decide which maxim to create and based on thetest which action to perform. The maxim when answering a widowsinquiry as to the nature and duration of her late husbands death, oneshould always tell the truth regarding the nature of her late husbandsdeath (M1) passes both parts of the Universal Law Formation of theCategorical Imperative. Consequently, according to Kant, M1 is a moralaction. The initial stage of the Universal Law Formation of the CategoricalImperative requires that a maxim be universally applicable to allrational beings. M1 succeeds in passing the first stage. We can easilyimagine a world in which paramedics always answer widows truthfully whenqueried. Therefore, this maxim is logical and everyone can abide by itwithout causing a logical impossibility. The next logical step is toapply the second stage of the test. The second requirement is that a rational being would will this maximto become a universal law. In testing this part, you must decide whetherin every case, a rational being would believe that the morally correctaction is to tell the truth. First, it is clear that the widow expectsto know the truth. A lie would only serve to spare her feelings if shebelieved it to be the truth. Therefore, even people who would considerlying to her, must concede that the correct and expected action is totell the truth. By asking she has already decided, good or bad, that shemust know the truth. What if telling the truth brings the widow to the point where shecommits suicide, however? Is telling her the truth then a moral actionalthough its consequence is this terrible response? If telling thewidow the truth drives her to commit suicide, it seems like no rationalbeing would will the maxim to become a universal law. The suicide is,however, a consequence of your initial action. The suicide has nobearing, at least for the Categorical Imperative, on whether telling thetruth is moral or not. Likewise it is impossible to judge whether uponhearing the news, the widow would commit suicide. Granted it is apossibility, but there are a multitude of alternative choices that shecould make and it is impossible to predict each one. To decide whetherrational being would will a maxim to become a law, the maxim itself mustbe examined rationally and not its consequences. Accordingly, the maximpasses the second test. Conversely, some people might argue that in telling the widow a lie,you spare her years of torment and suffering. These supporters of whitelies feel the maxim should read, When facing a distraught widow, youshould lie in regards to the death of her late husband in order to spareher feelings. Applying the first part of the Universal Law Formation ofthe Categorical Imperative, it appears that this maxim is a moral act. Certainly, a universal law that prevents the feelings of people who arealready in pain from being hurt further seems like an excellentuniversal law. Unfortunately for this line of objection, the only reasona lie works is because the person being lied to believes it to be thetruth. In a situation where every widow is lied to in order to spare herfeelings, then they never get the truth. This leads to a logicalcontradiction because no one will believe a lie if they know it a lieand the maxim fails. .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .postImageUrl , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:visited , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:active { border:0!important; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:active , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Medea By Euripides EssayPerhaps the die-hard liar can regroup and test a narrower maxim. If itis narrow enough so that it encompasses only a few people, then itpasses the first test. For example, the maxim could read, When facing adistraught widow whose late husband has driven off a bridge at night,and he struggled to get out of the car but ended up drowning, and he waswearing a brown suit and brown loafers, then you should tell the widowthat he died instantly in order to spare her feelings. We can easilyimagine a world in which all paramedics lied to widows in this specificsituation. That does not necessarily mean that it will pass the second testhowever. Even if it does pass the first test, narrowing down maxim cancreate other problems. For instance circumstances may change and thepeople who were originally included in the universal law, may not beincluded anymore. Consequently you many not want to will your maxim tobe a universal law. Likewise, if one person can make these maxims thatinclude only a select group of people, so can everyone else. If youcreate a maxim about lying to widows that is specific enough to pass thefirst test, so can everyone else. One must ask if rational beings wouldreally will such a world in which there would be many, many specific,but universal, laws. In order to answer this question, one must use therational I for the statement I, as a rational being would will such aworld, not the specific, embodied I which represents you in yourpresent condition. You must consider that you could be the widow in thesituation rather than the paramedi c, then decide whether you would willsuch a universal law. I agree with the morality based on Kantian principles because it isstrict in its application of moral conduct. Consequently there is novacillating in individual cases to determine whether an action is moralor not. An action is moral in itself not because of its consequences butbecause any rational being wills it to be a universal law and it doesnot contradict itself. Regardless of what the widow does with theinformation, the act of telling her the truth, is a moral one. No onewould argue that telling the truth, if she asks for it, is an immoralthing to do. Sometimes moral actions are difficult, and perhaps in thissituation it would be easier to lie to the widow, but it would still bean immoral action that I would not want everyone to do. This picture ofmorality resonates with my common sense view of morality. If the widowsubsequently commits suicide or commits any other immoral act as aconsequence, that has no bearing on the morality of the original actionin itself. Utilitarianism would differ on this point. Utilitarianism outlines thatan action is moral if it increases the total happiness of society. Morality is based on consequences. Telling a lie to the widow wouldincrease her happiness and consequently would, at least possibly, be amoral action. Utilitarianism would also take into account the precedentset by lying; however, the analysis still rests on predicted consequencerather than on the actions intrinsic moral value. The morality oftelling the lie is on a case by case basis. In some situations, it mightbe better to tell the truth, and according to utilitarianism that wouldthen be the moral action. Unlike Kantian philosophy, one is not bound byan immutable universal law. Instead one must judge in each case whichaction will produce the most overall happiness. The problem with thisapproach is that morality loses any value as a universal or intrinsicquality. Every decision is made on an individual basis in an individualand specific situation. In fact, utilitarianism considers happiness tobe the only intrinsically valuable end. .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .postImageUrl , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:visited , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:active { border:0!important; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:active , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Personal: The Yemin Order Project EssayDefenders of utilitarianism claim that it maintains universality byconsidering the greatest happiness of all beings, rather than justindividual happiness. Still, the morality is based on constantlychanging and often unpredictable consequences. The requirement that oneconsider all of the consequences of an action and determine the bestpossible action through such calculations makes me reject utilitarianismas a method of determining morality. Although utilitarianism often offers the easier solution to performbecause it produces immediate gratification and allows many exceptionsto common sense moral codes, the answers it gives are unfill ing andunrealistic. Furthermore, it is difficult, if not impossible, to makeall of the required calculations beforehand. Kants solution, althoughas interpreted by Kant is sometimes overly extreme, is much better thanutilitarianism. It resonates with my moral sensibilities to considerthat actions are moral or immoral regardless of their immediateconsequences. I am willing to accept that sometimes the moral action isharder to perform, but I am unwilling to accept that morality restswithin the specifics of a situation and the possible consequences. Therefore, I consider Kants Universal Law Formation of the CategoricalImperative to be a better test of morality than Mills Utilitarianism.